این سیستم برای 3dmax و رندر مناسبه؟

[reza76622201]

این سی پی یو از فرکانس کاری 3.4 برای هر هسته استفاده می کند که فقط کمی از محصول اینتل i7 ضعیف تر است ام از i5 قوی تر هست

اين فرمايش شما که Core i5-750 از Phenom II-X4 965 ضعيفتره کاملا غلطه و رد ميشه. اينم مدرک عزيز:

http://www.anandtech.com/bench/defau...102&p2=109&c=1

همونطور که ميبينيد توي تمامي موارد Core i5-750 کارآيي بالاتري داره.
لطفا در انجام مشاوره ها ضمن دقت کامل با دليل و منطق و مدرک معتبر صحبت کنيد. ممنون.

[ViViD]

اين فرمايش شما که Core i5-750 از Phenom II-X4 965 ضعيفتره کاملا غلطه و رد ميشه. اينم مدرک عزيز:

http://www.anandtech.com/bench/defau...102&p2=109&c=1

همونطور که ميبينيد توي تمامي موارد Core i5-750 کارآيي بالاتري داره.
لطفا در انجام مشاوره ها ضمن دقت کامل با دليل و منطق و مدرک معتبر صحبت کنيد. ممنون.

[/right]

با سلام خدمت آقا رضا این فرمایش شما که فرمودید کلاً این برتری اشتباه و غلط!!! هست رو من قبول ندارم طبق مدارکی که موجود هست و در خیلی از سایتها میبینیم بعضی ها اینتل بالاتره بعضی اینتل پایینتره پس هیچ وقت با قاطعیت نمیتوان اظهار نظر کرد به تستهای بسیاری از سایتها دقت کنید:


برای مشاهده این لینک/عکس می بایست عضو شوید ! برای عضویت اینجا کلیک کنید

برای مشاهده این لینک/عکس می بایست عضو شوید ! برای عضویت اینجا کلیک کنید

برای مشاهده این لینک/عکس می بایست عضو شوید ! برای عضویت اینجا کلیک کنید

برای مشاهده این لینک/عکس می بایست عضو شوید ! برای عضویت اینجا کلیک کنید

برای مشاهده این لینک/عکس می بایست عضو شوید ! برای عضویت اینجا کلیک کنید
برای مشاهده این لینک/عکس می بایست عضو شوید ! برای عضویت اینجا کلیک کنید

بعضی جملات بکار رفته در سایتها:


i5 is about 45% WORSE in non-gaming applications.

Truespace 5.1
i5 = 55
p2 = 63
i5 is 13% faster
Truespace 7.5
i5 = 157
p2 = 144
p2 is 9% faster
Cinebench 2003
i5 = 1935
p2 = 1708
i5 is 12% faster
Cinebench r10
i5 = 11320
p2 = 11096
i5 is 2% faster
MainConcept H.264
i5 = 50.2
p2 = 43.68
p2 is 13% faster
Dvdshrink 3.2
i5 = 167
p2 = 159
p2 is 5% faster
Nero 9 recode
i5 = 422
p2 = 402
p2 is 5% faster
V-dub non sse4
i5 = 16
p2 = 15
p2 is 6% faster
v-dub sse4
i5 = 17
p2 = 20
i5 is 15% faster
DIEP chess
i5 = 863563.4
p2 = 948604.1
p2 is 9% faster
Crysis
i5 = 170.5
p2 = 177.8
p2 is 4% faster
UT3
i5 = 147.0
p2 = 139.0
i5 is 5% faster

Overall
i5 wins =
13
12
2
15
5
= 47
p2 wins =
9
13
5
5
6
9
4
= 51
Phenom II 965 BE is 8% faster than the i5 750 on those alone.

چند لینک تست:


http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/819/4
http://benchmarkreviews.com/index.ph...1&limitstart=6
http://www.techspot.com/review/193-intel-core-i5-750/
http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets...oc.aspx?i=3634
http://www.guru3d.com/article/core-i...r-review-test/
http://www.overclockersclub.com/revi...750_corei7870/
http://www.neoseeker.com/Articles/Ha...ews/lynnfield/
http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/cpu...d-cpu-review/1
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...e-i5,2410.html
http://www.lostcircuits.com/mambo//i...d=63&Itemid=42


یک بررسی جالب از چند مقایسه تستهای چندین لینک بالا:

i5 750 is blue
Phenom II 965 is green
Results are red

Techspot:

Apps:
Microsoft Excel 2007 (lower = > Lg/Sm): 13.14/2.15 11.10/1.44
Phenom II 965 16%/33% = 24.5% faster
WinRAR Compression (lower = > Win7 DVD/720p file): 9.52/42.50 13.44/63.48
i5 750 29%/33% = 31% faster
Adobe Photoshop CS4 (lower = > Smart Blur/Extrude): 47.2/66.3 41.2/66.9
Phenom II 965 13%/-1% = 6% faster

Games:
Unreal Tournament 3 (FPS 1024x768/1920x1200): 268/162 263/164
Tie difference is less than 1%
Street Fighter IV (FPS 1024x768 1920x1200): 236/166 226/167
i5 750 4%/0% = 2% faster
Far Cry 2 (FPS 1024x768 1920x1200): 97/71 88/70
i5 750 9%/2% = 5.5% faster

Anandtech:
Apps:
Adobe Photoshop CS4 (lower = > ): 18.1 21.1
i5 750 = 14% faster
DivX 6.8.5 (lower = > ): 39.4 42.5
i5 750 = 7% faster
x264 HD encode 1st pass (FPS): 72.9 77.7
Phenom II 965 = 6% faster
x264 HD encode 2nd pass (FPS): 21 20.3
i5 750 = 3% faster
Windows media encder 9 x64 (lower = > ) 30 28
Phenom II 965 - 6% faster
3dsmax 9 (higher = > ): 13.4 11.9
i5 750 = 11% faster
Blender 2.48a (lower = better): 59.9 69.5
i5 750 = 14% faster
POV-Ray 3.73 (higher = > ): 2710 2706
Tie difference is less than 1%
Microsoft Excel 2007 (lower = > ): 20.1 23.8
i5 750 = 16% faster
Sony Vegas Pro 8 (lower = > ): 206 238
i5 750 = 13% faster
Sorenson Squeeze: FLV Creation (lower = > ): 127.7 134.6
i5 750 = 5% faster
PAR2 Archive Recovery (lower = > ): 29.7 32.8
i5 750 = 9% faster
WinRAR - Archive Creation (lower = > ) 96.2 105.7
i5 750 = 9% faster
Gaming:
Fallout 3 (FPS): 86.2 87.7
Phenom II 965 = 2% faster
Left 4 Dead (FPS): 130.1 126.1
i5 750 = 3% faster
Crysis Warhead (FPS): 83.3 81.4
i5 750 = 2% faster
Lost Circuits:
Apps:
Caligari TrueSpace 5.1 Vases (lower = > ): 55 63
i5 750 = 13% faster
Caligari TrueSpace 5.1 Ducati (^ same): 157 144
Phenom II 965 = 8% faster
MainConcept H.264 (lower = > ): 50.2 43.68
Phenom II 965 = 13% faster
DVD-Shrink 3.2 (lower = > ): 167 159
Phenom II 965 = 5% faster
Neroبرای مشاهده این لینک/عکس می بایست عضو شوید ! برای عضویت اینجا کلیک کنید 9 Recode (lower = > ): 422 402
Phenom II 965 = 5% faster
V-Dub/DivX 6.8 no SSE4 (lower = > ): 16 15
Phenom II 965 = 6% faster
V-Dub/DivX 6.8 SSE4 (lower = > ): 17 20
i5 750 = 15% faster
DIEP Chess (higher = > ): 863563.4 948604.1
Phenom II 965 = 9% faster
Games:
Unreal Tournament 3 (FPS): 147 139
i5 750 = 5% faster
Devil May Cry 4 (FPS scene 1/2/3/4): 86.36/148.85/80.81/115.46 92.82/126.08/85.19/117.5
Tie difference is less than 1%
Far Cry2 Small Ranch (FPS high/avg/low): 73.49/32.37/21.96 56.96/31.89/22.69
i5 750 22%/1%/-3% = 7% faster
Guru3d:
Apps:
Video transcoding H.264 (lower = > ): 12.92 12.96
Tie difference is less than 1%
Kribi - Sponge Explode (FPS): 7.1 8.8
Phenom II 965 = 19% faster
AES Data Encryption (higher = > ): 21428 24500
Phenom II 965 = 12% faster
Games:
BiA: Hells Highway (FPS 1024x768/1280x1024): 91/83 77/75
i5 750 15%/10% = 12.5% faster
BiA: Hells Highway (FPS 1600x1200/1920x1200): 71/67 70/67
Tie difference is less than 1%
Crysis Warhard (FPS 1024x768/1280x1024): 57/47 54/45
i5 750 5%/4% = 4.5% faster
Crysis Warhard (FPS 1600x1200/1920x1200): 37/34 36/33
i5 750 3%/3% = 3% faster

OverclocksClub
Apps:
Apophysis (lower = > ): 27 21
Phenom II 965 = 22% faster
WinRAR ZIP (lower = > 100mb/500mb): 13/58 11/59
Phenom II 965 15%/-2% = 6.5% faster
WinRAR RAR (lower = > 100mb/500mb): 25/136 22/119
Phenom II 965 12%/12% = 12% faster
Office 2007 Excel (lower = > ): 5.5 8.2
i5 750 = 33% faster
POV Ray 3.7 (higher = > ): 2576 2778
Phenom II 965 = 7% faster
Games:
Far Cry2 (FPS 1280x1024/1680x1050/1920x1200): 65/58/51 69/63/55
Phenom II 965 6%/8%/7% = 7% faster
Crysis Warhead (^ same): 26/20/17 26/21/16
Tie difference is less than 1%
Bioshock (^ same): 166/128/109 156/125/102
i5 750 6%/2%/6% = 5% faster
COD: WAW (^ same): 82/70/59 81/70/60
Tie difference is less than 1%
Dead Space (^ same): 196/156/134 191/160/136
Tie difference is less than 1%
Fallout 3 (^ same): 83/81/78 80/76/75
i5 750 4%/6%/4% = 5% faster
Left 4 Dead (^ same): 118/98/83 117/98/85
Tie difference is less than 1%
Neoseeker:

Apps:
Handbrake (lower = > ): 217 211
Phenom II 965 = 3% faster
POV-Ray (higher = > ): 2531 2818.54
Phenom II 965 = 10% faster
WinRAR (lower = > 100mb/500mb/1000mb) 10/46/118 8/34/88
Phenom II 965 20%/26%/25% = 24% faster

Games:
Call of Juarez (FPS): 106 102
i5 750 = 4% faster
World in Conflict (FPS): 238 197
i5 750 = 17% faster
Lost Planet (FPS snow/cave) 261/113 280/112
Phenom II 965 7%/-1% = 3% faster
Left 4 Dead (FPS 1280x1024/1680x1050/1920x1200): 127/107/90 126/108/91
i5 750 = 1% faster
Crysis Warhard (FPS ^ same): 47/39/32 47/39/33
Phenom II 965 = 3% faster
Bioshock (^ same): 182/150/118 197/148/122
Phenom II 965 8%/-1%/3% = 3% faster
Far Cry 2 (^ same): 68/60/53 77/68/59
Phenom II 965 12%/12%/10% = 11% faster

Tomshardware:

Apps:
Main Concept 1.6.1 (lower = > ): 1.59 1.57
Phenom II 965 = 1% faster
iTunes v8.2.1.6 (lower = > ): 1.24 1.38
i5 750 = 10% faster
TMPGEnc 4.7 (lower = > DivX/Xvid): 2.07/3.42 2.37/4.06
i5 750 13%/16% = 14.5% faster
Lame 3.98.2 (lower = > ): 1.54 2.14
i5 750 = 28% faster
WinZip 12.1 (lower = > ): 4.57 5.07
i5 750 = 10% faster
WinRAR 3.90 (lower = > ): 1.06 1.26
i5 750 = 16% faster
3ds Max 2009 (lower - > ): 0.32 0.35
i5 750 = 8% faster
AVG Anti-Virus 8.5 (lower = > ): 2.20 2.13
Phenom II 965 = 3% faster
Photoshop CS4 (lower = > ): 2.03 2.51
i5 750 = 19% faster
Bit-Tech:

Apps:
GIMP Image Editing Test (higher = > ): 1197 1070
i5 750 = 11% faster
HandBrake Video Encoding (Higher - > ): 1939 1816
i5 750 = 6% faster
Mutlitasking Test (higher = > ): 1285 1003
i5 750 = 22% faster

Games:
Crysis (FPS avg/min.) 34/27 31/23
i5 750 9%/15% = 12% faster
X3: Terran Condlict 83/40 75/37
i5 750 10%/7% = 8% faster

و باز نتیجه گیری این مقایسه ها:


i5 750:
Apps: 337.5% / 24 wins = 14.0625% average lead.
Games: 96.5% / 15 wins = 6.4333% average lead.

Phenom II 965:
Apps: 205% / 18 wins = 11.3889% average lead
Games: 26% / 6 = 4.3333% average lead.

i5 750:

1. It is faster
2. The P55 chipset can support both SLI and Crossfire whereas the AM3 chipset can only support one or the other
3. Hyperthreading

i5 750 DOES NOT have hyperthreading, but the i7 860 does




Phenom II 965:

1. It costs less:

2. The future is certain
3. Phenom II is cool
i5 750 runs HOT, I know I have one, but Phenom II runs a decent amount cooler

در خیلی از تستها اینتل برتری دارد از لحاظ نرم افزارهای مختلفی ولی در خیلی از کارآییهای دیگر AMD برتری دارد و حتی در نرم افزارها بازیها برتری خودش رو نشون میده


به هر حال من تعصبی نگاه نکردم دوست داشتم مقداری اطلاعات بالاتر برودبرای مشاهده این لینک/عکس می بایست عضو شوید ! برای عضویت اینجا کلیک کنید